Vandalism claim on your rental denied? What Nevada landlords should know
A landlord policy that lists vandalism and malicious mischief as covered perils can still produce a denial — usually through a vacancy clause or a tenant-damage exclusion. Here is how those denials work, and why many of them do not survive a careful reading of the policy.
A Nevada landlord contacted us after her carrier denied a vandalism claim on a rental home. The policy clearly listed vandalism and malicious mischief as covered perils. The tenants had been away for a week on vacation; someone broke in and wrecked the place. She filed a police report, submitted it with the claim, and received a denial.
This pattern — covered peril, police report, denial anyway — is common enough on rental properties that it is worth explaining how it happens and what to do about it.
How a covered peril turns into a denial
Carriers rarely deny a vandalism claim by saying vandalism is not covered. They deny it by invoking a condition or exclusion that switches the coverage off. On rental properties there are three usual suspects.
1. The vacancy clause
Most landlord and dwelling policies suspend vandalism coverage when the property has been vacant for longer than a set period, commonly 30 or 60 consecutive days. The reasoning is that empty buildings attract vandals. The key word is vacant, and the policy defines it: usually a dwelling that does not contain enough furnishings and belongings for someone to live there. A home where the tenants have furniture, clothes and food in the refrigerator and are away for a week is occupied but unoccupied, not vacant. Carriers blur that distinction in denial letters. The policy definition is what controls.
2. The tenant-damage exclusion
Many landlord policies exclude damage caused by tenants or their guests, on the theory that is a lease matter, not an insurance matter. A carrier may deny vandalism by suggesting, without evidence, that the tenants or someone they let in caused the damage. A police report documenting forced entry while the tenants were away answers that directly. The burden of proving an exclusion applies is on the carrier, not the policyholder.
3. “Wear and tear” or “neglect”
When vandalism damage is extensive — holes in walls, flooring destroyed, fixtures torn out — a carrier may characterize some of it as pre-existing wear or landlord neglect. Move-in inspection reports, dated photographs and the police report establish the condition before and after.
What Nevada law requires of the carrier
Nevada regulates claim handling through its Unfair Claims Settlement Practices rules. Among other things, a carrier must acknowledge a claim promptly, conduct a reasonable investigation before denying it, and approve or deny the claim within 30 days of receiving proof of loss, with a written explanation of the policy basis for any denial. A denial that cites a vacancy clause without establishing that the property met the policy’s definition of vacant is not a reasonable investigation. Nevada also recognizes a claim for bad faith when an insurer denies a claim without a reasonable basis, which gives a represented policyholder real leverage.
What the claim should contain
- The police report, with the date of the incident and the officer’s description of forced entry.
- The lease, showing the property was tenanted on the date of loss.
- Evidence of occupancy: tenant statement, utility usage, photographs of furnished rooms, anything showing people lived there and were temporarily away.
- A full damage inventory with photographs, separated into structural damage, fixtures, and any landlord-owned contents (appliances, window coverings).
- Repair estimates from contractors, not the carrier’s software.
- Loss of rents, if the policy includes it: the period the unit cannot be rented while repairs are made.
After a denial
A denial letter is the carrier’s position, not a verdict. The next step is a written response that quotes the policy’s actual definition of vacancy, documents occupancy on the date of loss, and demands reconsideration under Nevada’s claims regulations. Most vacancy-clause denials on tenanted properties do not survive that response. If the carrier holds its position, the Nevada Division of Insurance accepts complaints, and bad-faith exposure makes continued refusal expensive for the carrier.
Metropolitan Adjustment Bureau is licensed in Nevada and represents landlords in Reno, Sparks, Las Vegas, Henderson and across the state on vandalism, theft, fire and water claims. We review denials for free.
Related
- Theft and vandalism claims
- Public adjusters in Reno
- Nevada public adjusters
- Why claims get denied, delayed and underpaid
Free claim review: (818) 905-6800.
Need Help With Your Claim?
Our licensed public adjusters are ready to fight for your maximum settlement.
Free Claim Evaluation
Don't settle for less than you deserve. Our licensed public adjusters will review your claim at no cost.
Get Free ConsultationOr call (818) 905-6800